How do domestic scientific instruments innovate?

The instrumentation industry is a pillar of China's meaning, and scientific instruments are a major part of the word industry. If we can better make scientific instruments break the tradition and make new changes to it, this will be introduced in detail below. The meter and meter industry has a major contribution.

Scientific instruments are the most high value-added products in the instrument and equipment industry. In recent years, according to statistical data, although the development of scientific research instruments in China has achieved certain results, compared to the international environment, local instruments are still surrounded by foreign products. Under difficult conditions, the overall state of survival has not been much improved.

Analytical instruments, as the star family in laboratories and scientific instruments, occupy most of the laboratory construction funds. However, with regard to the current development status of analytical instruments, whether they are universities or national key laboratories, analytical instruments are mostly European and American brands. Although there are few domestically produced equipments, they are poor products, and all belong to low-end products. The high-end scientific equipments and domestic brands are basically left blank. In the first half of 2010, among the new laboratory analysis instruments, only the Dai-an company introduced an ICS-5000 ion chromatograph. Shimadzu and Agilent respectively introduced a liquid chromatograph. Domestic equipment manufacturers did not introduce innovations in this field. Products, mass spectrometers In addition to the introduction of one or two new foreign major international analysis companies, local companies have only introduced a portable mass spectrometry device from Beijing East-West Instruments.

At present, the proportion of China’s investment in scientific instruments and independent research and development is seriously distorted. Simply put, the money we spend on buying other people’s equipment is far greater than the amount of money we spend on equipment research and development. In recent years, the scientific instrument industry has experienced a very bad phenomenon of re-introduction and light self-development. China's annual purchase of imported scientific instruments amounts to nearly 100 billion yuan, and it grows at a rate of 20% each year. However, the investment in independent innovation of scientific research instruments is seriously insufficient. In the long run, it is not a foreign brand that has pushed our national brands out of the market. Instead, it is a decisive battle that we have given up on our own. The national key universities and colleges are looking for equipment management offices. Together they cannot find a few mass spectrometry instruments. Yes, but few of them are applied to scientific research fields. At the most, they are used as a simulation and demonstration in teaching. How do you make these scientific instruments develop?

Second, although there are a large number of scientific instrument companies in our country, they are very serious in their hearts and they all want to be “sparrows”. This will often lead to a decline in the core competitiveness of enterprises. According to statistics, there are nearly 1,000 scientific instrument manufacturers in China, and most of the production values ​​are below 10 million yuan. There are more than 200 analytical instrument manufacturers, but only a few million yuan in output value, and the independent research and development capabilities are weak and the products are single. All the small “sparrows” are fully-equipped and the competition between them is inevitable. Moreover, some enterprises in China still have vicious competition. This led to a weak state of development of the entire instrument market. Another point is that from the aspect of enterprises, that is, "another problem in China's scientific instrument industry is more tracking imitation and less original innovation. And because China's scientific instrument companies have relatively weak research and development capabilities, most of the technology is from higher education institutions. And scientific research institutions are responsible for this, but currently the technical cooperation between the school and the enterprise is very limited, which leads to a low conversion rate of scientific and technological achievements, and companies can not independently undertake innovative research and development of new equipment.So this area is lagging behind the development is an inevitable result.